• Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Baby Formula! Now with 12% less Lead than the leading brand!

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What about that one with 50% more lead, but you don’t mind trading a couple of your baby’s IQ points for those sweet savings?

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Hmm that’s a tough trade-off. More developmental disabilities, but is the Value™ really there to justify the decreased cost?

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If children wanted higher quality food they would go out and make their own money.

            Mine are broke so they’ll eat what I feed them.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    TIL in the US they need an extra law to limit harmful substances in (baby) food. Normal people would call this “common sense”, but it seems to be rather uncommon in the US.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The FDA was supposed to just be regulating this as their job already. I’m not sure why they need a specific law, but I’m just going to assume the answer is Reagan.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the FDA, FTC, USDA, EPA, Depts of Transportation, and CDC wanted to guarantee and check their work, we’d have universal healthcare. And in fact I think that’s exactly the legal argument for why the government should be FORCED to provide us healthcare - how else would we be able to catch (and class action sue for) large community-wide health hazards such as:

        -asbestos in baby powder

        -lead and heavy metals in vitamins and supplements

        -consistency of dosing in medications

        -Deaths from auto accidents when we should be having trains

        -Deaths from contaminated eggs, meat, milk from bird flu or other pathogens

        -Products that are blatant lies/false

        -Companies leaking chemicals into water supplies

        -Lead in water supply

        -Heavy metals in water supply& in crops, from exhaust from cars and bits of tires

        -imminent looming climate change

        Gee, I wonder why corporations are scared of us getting healthcare?

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I will not let them take my babies daily intake of arsenic and mercury away!

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Without led in their system, how are we going to develop the next generation of psychopaths and right wing voters?

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am genuinely surprised that this isn’t already in place for all foods. We’ve known about the harm they cause for a very long time.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Klobuchar, Krishnamoorthi, Duckworth, and Cárdenas. All Democratic senators.

      It was originally put forth by Krishnamoorthi late last year.