• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    They very clearly broke it up in a way that disconnects the two statements removing context from the quote from the scientist, but do go on.

    • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Reductions in emissions of aerosols from Chinese factories may be partly to blame for recent heatwaves in the Pacific, a new study has said.

      The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggests that repeated marine heatwaves over the past decade could be linked to reduction in pollution from factories in China.

      “The study”? What study? There’s no context!

      Over the past decade, the north Pacific has experienced multiple such heatwaves – also known as "warm blob” events – leading to fish die-offs, toxic algae blooms and missing whales.

      Such heatwaves have been generally attributed to global warming though it is unknown exactly why it could cause such sudden and variable increases in a specific part of the planet.

      “Such heatwaves”? What heatwaves? There’s no context!

      The entire article is written like this. Every single sentence is its own paragraph other than the last one, which tacks a short quote at the end.