boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoCubic millimetre of brain mapped in spectacular detailwww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1345arrow-down15cross-posted to: science@hexbear.netscience@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1340arrow-down1external-linkCubic millimetre of brain mapped in spectacular detailwww.nature.comboem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: science@hexbear.netscience@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareYIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-28 months ago far more processor intensive than the most advanced AIs we currently have This is the second comment I’ve seen from you where you confidently say something incorrect. Maybe stop trying to be orator of the objective and learn a little more first.
minus-squareEcho DotlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·8 months agoCitation needed on that comment of yours. Because I know for a fact that what I said is true. Go look it up.
minus-squareYIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI think the claim that 24 year old technology is more computationally intensive than the ground breaking tech of the modern day needs the citation.
This is the second comment I’ve seen from you where you confidently say something incorrect. Maybe stop trying to be orator of the objective and learn a little more first.
Citation needed on that comment of yours. Because I know for a fact that what I said is true. Go look it up.
I think the claim that 24 year old technology is more computationally intensive than the ground breaking tech of the modern day needs the citation.