Two decades of U.S. policy appear to be rooted in a mistaken understanding of what happened that day. archive

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we had only invaded Afghanistan, I could understand it. But Iraq, as I said at the time, had absolutely nothing to do with it, and it was bullshit.

      • Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        No “we” don’t. A very small minority whom have been gerrymandered to such an extreme to give the frauds who have taken over our government with their bribes the power to enact these policies.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      We didn’t need to invade any damn whole country, we have multiple special teams that train precisely for hunting and gathering. The govt of Iraq and the poppy fields of Afghanistan needed freedom though, so we went hot after the Saudis attacked us.

      Murican capitalism war hooah!

      • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re not wrong, we didn’t get bin Laden until we sent one of those special teams into the territory of an"ally".