☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoUS-supplied HIMARS 'completely ineffective' against superior Russian jamming technology, report sayswww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down123cross-posted to: technology@lemmygrad.mltechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up1-8arrow-down1external-linkUS-supplied HIMARS 'completely ineffective' against superior Russian jamming technology, report sayswww.businessinsider.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmygrad.mltechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squarecygnus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·6 months ago Please do provide sources that Starklink is used for targeting weapons. Are you serious? Did you not read the article you yourself posted, or just saw the “Murica bad” headline and rolled with it?
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·6 months agoIf you work on your reading comprehension, you’ll see that nowhere does it say that Starlink is used for targeting. It’s used for communication and that’s being disrupted along with targeting systems which have fuck all to do with Starlink.
Are you serious? Did you not read the article you yourself posted, or just saw the “Murica bad” headline and rolled with it?
If you work on your reading comprehension, you’ll see that nowhere does it say that Starlink is used for targeting. It’s used for communication and that’s being disrupted along with targeting systems which have fuck all to do with Starlink.