spoiler
asdfasfasfasfas
Depressing.
Thanks for saving a click though
Yeah! This “raw story” is fuckin cooked!
But it’s definitely rawdogging something,
Some Trump supporters are entrenched because of the fake “Biden crime family” narrative. They have to keep it going lest reality appear.
Never mind the 91 felonies their incoherent cult leader is facing.
Witch Hunt!
Lol, right? It’d be a little believable if it was one or two, kinda like what they’re doing to Hunter… BUT 91??? Come on man
It is not “cold political analysis” at all. She is still simping for Trump morons, by pretending anything connecting to Hunter Biden is somehow important for Biden voters. It is just Fox News pathetic attempt at trying to mitigate the Hunter Biden slander lawsuit.
spoiler
asdfasfasfasfas
She’s right we’re entrenched. The news cycle did it, period
spoiler
asdfasfasfasfas
I was about to vote for Hunter Biden this election but NOT ANYMORE!
There’s so much useless noise coming from that channel that I can’t rely on anything I think I know about Hunter Biden. All I’m willing to say is that I’m pretty sure he’s a real person. Oh, and he may have owned a laptop at some point. That’s it.
They’re talking about a trial, but has he been officially indicted with anything?
It was proven in congress with evidence that he has a fat fucking cock and likes to bang hot chicks.
He has actually had addiction issues in the past and I’m pretty sure he has gone through rehab more than once. But why that matters, I don’t know
Buttery males!
He’s been charged with gun stuff and tax stuff.
And once again, I ask: Where is the NRA?
And where was the NRA when Philando Castile was shot?
You mean the ATF? The atf is the government department dedicated to guns. The NRA is a pro-guns lobby group.
No, I mean the NRA. Why aren’t they leaping to his defense? Much like how they didn’t leap to the defense of a black legal gun owner who was murdered by police.
They generally dont do that. Theres a highly publicized exception every once in a while, but it is not the norm.
Ironic… because Raw story is essentially the Fox News of the left.
Clickbait and low quality yes, but generally RawStory doesn’t lie
Ehhhhhh…. not so much.
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Left out the next paragraph:
Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that usually favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and promptly correcting any false or misleading reports.
They’re biased. That’s the point I was making. News should not be biased. Period.
End of story.
You ended a comment with “period” and “end of story” so you must be right.
