• morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s a perfectly fine comparison, because people are buying them for the exact same thing. Just because they’ve been sorted into different categories for other reasons doesn’t change that.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, because all methods of transportation are not used for “the exact same thing”. If it was a 7 seater SUV, it would be a bad comparison, because that’s for carrying more people and must be larger. Same for a motorcycle. But it’s not, it’s a five seater car with a moderate trunk that people are buying for the exact same use case.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You’re right, they’re not all used for transportation.

          Yes I’m trolling a bit, one could argue a modern smart phone and the first cell phones are a bad comparison because they “aren’t used for the same thing” but that’s just needlessly pedantic.

          In this case, I do think it’s fair to point out a crossover/suv being compared to a sedan is different enough to be a bad comparison, it’s not “Apples to Oranges” (why can’t fruit be compared?) but it is intentionally misleading for comparing cars of the same type when they’re not the same type and pointing at the size difference.

          • morrowind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes it is very intentional, because the point is not to say, “look at this sedan and this suv”, the point is, “look at cars and how they are becoming bigger”, a major part of which is people unnecessarily buying bigger cars. It’s comparing the “average” car of the past to the “average” car today. In fact, if you were to compare sedans to sedans while trying to make that point, I say that would be disingenuous.

            By example, if I was comparing computer storage though the ages, I wouldn’t compare magnetic tape to magnetic tape today, I’d compare it to ssds. And it wouldn’t be disingenuous because they’re different types of storage, because the point I’m making is about storage as a whole.

            If SUVs are replacing sedans, I think it’s entirely fair to compare them.

        • rpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I just had to tow a U-Haul trailer with all of my furniture packed inside. A five seater car would not be able to do this.

          • wieson@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            You decided to do that, you didn’t have to. Since the trailer was rented out, you could have just as well rented out a U-Haul truck.

            • wieson@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Especially a minority of their own time. Moving houses doesn’t happen every day.