realitista@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · edit-24 个月前Seeing a lot of this lately...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square490fedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down1204file-text
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageSeeing a lot of this lately...lemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · edit-24 个月前message-square490fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down11·edit-24 个月前Yeah, while it’s possible to explain away contrary perspectives and any contrary evidence, it’s better to block them out altogether so that you never hear anything that could challenge your conspiracy theory in the first place.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·4 个月前It’s not a “conspiracy theory” when there’s an actual well-documented conspiracy.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down8·4 个月前It’s well documented that everyone who disagrees with you is a secret agent?
minus-squareDkarma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·4 个月前No one said that. More bad faith here with the straw man logical fallacy. This guy checks all the bad faith boxes. Block, but not because this person disagrees, rather they can’t debate in good faith and are just trolling.
Yeah, while it’s possible to explain away contrary perspectives and any contrary evidence, it’s better to block them out altogether so that you never hear anything that could challenge your conspiracy theory in the first place.
It’s not a “conspiracy theory” when there’s an actual well-documented conspiracy.
It’s well documented that everyone who disagrees with you is a secret agent?
No one said that. More bad faith here with the straw man logical fallacy. This guy checks all the bad faith boxes.
Block, but not because this person disagrees, rather they can’t debate in good faith and are just trolling.