Rainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoif this post gets 64 upvotes, i will post again with twice as wide en passantlemmy.worldimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1529arrow-down178
arrow-up1451arrow-down1imageif this post gets 64 upvotes, i will post again with twice as wide en passantlemmy.worldRainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarecrawancon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoI thought we established last time thst it was fancier to put all of the emphasis on the en and entirely gloss over, barely mumbling passant. eeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpassant
minus-squareArtyom@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoI’m willing to negotiate for multiple ens as separate words, but multiple ns in a single en makes no sense at all. I’m adding 64 passes, which is physically meaningful. It’s important we stay grounded in reality here.
minus-squareDayroom7485@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months ago+1 for actually counting the passes. It’s hard work, but someone has to do it, goddammit!
I thought we established last time thst it was fancier to put all of the emphasis on the en and entirely gloss over, barely mumbling passant.
eeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnpassant
I’m willing to negotiate for multiple ens as separate words, but multiple ns in a single en makes no sense at all. I’m adding 64 passes, which is physically meaningful. It’s important we stay grounded in reality here.
+1 for actually counting the passes. It’s hard work, but someone has to do it, goddammit!
Let me demonstrate: eeeennnnnn