ylai@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1448arrow-down126cross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksprogramming@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1422arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comylai@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square137fedilinkcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksprogramming@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down3·edit-26 months agoIf 2 and 3 happen the game is up. Management killed it. That’s not agiles fault.
minus-square0x0@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoSurely you’re not gonna blame the manager… /s
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoBut that’s what agile sounds like to management. They don’t understand the “it’s held together by hopes and dreams” communication, because all they see is something that appears to work. So why would they invest anything else in it.
If 2 and 3 happen the game is up. Management killed it.
That’s not agiles fault.
Surely you’re not gonna blame the manager… /s
But that’s what agile sounds like to management. They don’t understand the “it’s held together by hopes and dreams” communication, because all they see is something that appears to work. So why would they invest anything else in it.