jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoDick Van Dyke, at 98, Becomes Oldest Daytime Emmy Winner Everwww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down19cross-posted to: usnews@lemy.lol
arrow-up1335arrow-down1external-linkDick Van Dyke, at 98, Becomes Oldest Daytime Emmy Winner Everwww.rollingstone.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: usnews@lemy.lol
minus-squareFiniteLooper@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·5 months agoSeems valid to show the age if you’re winning an award and the oldest person to ever do so
minus-squareMalachaiConstant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months agoI’m assuming they also saw the age and jumped ahead into the mourning process.
minus-squareSnapz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·5 months agoPut it at the end, otherwise, this is knowing clickbait. “Dick Van Dyke wins Emmy, at 98” reads very differently than, “Dick Van Dyke, 98, wins Emmy”. We’re trained to recognize structure of the second as a death announcement.
Seems valid to show the age if you’re winning an award and the oldest person to ever do so
I’m assuming they also saw the age and jumped ahead into the mourning process.
Put it at the end, otherwise, this is knowing clickbait.
“Dick Van Dyke wins Emmy, at 98” reads very differently than, “Dick Van Dyke, 98, wins Emmy”. We’re trained to recognize structure of the second as a death announcement.