• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like if the US just turns its back on Israel, we’d lose our leverage to press a negotiated agreement, which would surely not end with Israel digging in their heels even further. (/s) It’s almost like geopolitics are - wait for it - complicated.

    Which would end up with Israel in a war not just with Palestine but probably other countries in the region. And something I feel people forget: Israel has nuclear weapons but doesn’t acknowledge them. Which means we don’t have a great idea of their nuclear capability. So if Israel’s existence is being threatened, there’s a good chance to ruin that part of the world for generations and/or start WW3.

    • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you saying that if the US stops sending Israel weapons, they will likely start a nuclear war? Bruh

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If Israel is fighting for it’s survival and it has nukes? Uh yeah? That’s why no one’s itching to invade Russia even though they are a LOT weaker than expected.

        • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Guess I just don’t see the flattening of Gaza and displacement of more than 1 million Palestinian civilians as Israel “fighting for it’s survival,” nor do I see an immediate cessation of sending US bombs to Israel as leaving them in the dust.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Remember though that Iran has already launched a significant attack on Israel, and it was because of the US and their allies that casualties were heavily curbed. If the US had previously stopped all operations, it could very well have turned into an existential war for Israel.

            None of that remotely defends what Israel is doing. And I completely agree we need to stop sending them bombs and additional military support for Gaza. But my point is that there is a potential for a much bigger, possibly nuclear conflict if countries cut all ties.

            • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I get what you’re saying, but I’m not certain the Iranian drone attack would have even happened if Israel hadn’t been engaged in the raising of Gaza with US backing.

              I mean, Israel bombed an Iranian embassy two weeks before that occurred.

              I’m in somewhat agreement with you. On the one hand, there are innocent Israelis who need to be protected (here, I don’t necessarily buy the nuclear risk, tbh. Continued US protection is more about prevention of civilian casualties, to me ). On the other, our continued support further emboldens Israel to keep fucking shit up over there, so of course they’re going to experience aggression from their neighbors.

              Unfortunately this starts getting into a game of who-shot-first, which is a bad state to be in.

              If anything, all this is a win-win for the “defense” industry.

              Edit: also, for the record, and in the context of this thread, even though I’d argue against continued US military support of Israel, and that Biden hasn’t been forceful enough on that issue, and that Democrats in general are too comfortable with the status quo regarding free market capitalism for individuals and socialism for the corporations, and that many of them serve their own interests or those of corporations, you still gotta vote for Biden this election, especially if you’re in a swing state. The two parties are not the same, even if they do both suck. The degrees of suckage are not equal.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Continued US protection is more about prevention of civilian casualties, to me

                I completely agree, and you have a good point that Israel did bomb the embassy first. Technically Iran does seem to support Hamas, but they still doesn’t justify what Israel did.

                All in all, Israel is inserting itself into these situations. They’re being genocidal and aggressive, and prompting responses. They feel justified in lethal force for self defence, only after they purposely put themselves in harm’s way. My ideal US policy at this point would be defending civilians and nothing else – but even then, like you say, it emboldens Israel to continue being a rogue state.

                And I agree with your final sentiment completely. Democrats aren’t perfect, but Republicans are so terrible by comparison that they make Democrats look like spotless. I see a vote for Biden and Democrats as a means to eventually address the issues with unfettered capitalism and corporate greed – the Republican party is fractured and in a bad place. Repeated Democrat victories by high margins will destroy their party, and allow us to finally focus on reining in corporations and nationalizing critical industries. We need Republicans out of the way first before we can fix those. You can’t fix a house with totally broken plumbing if it’s currently on fire.