• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Tell us you didn’t read what I just wrote without telling us you didn’t read it.

    The engine will only stall under load if it is at so low of an RPM that it is generating insufficient torque to overcome the inertia. Which if you are moving and in the correct gear for your speed is never.

    Which is why your transmission has more than one gear.

    Remember back 30 seconds ago when I told you to think? Actually try it this time. Or maybe plug some of your bullshit into Google first before continuing to make a fool of yourself in front of everybody.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which if you are moving and in the correct gear for your speed is never.

      In stop and go traffic it’s practically always. The car needs to be able to handle that, it can’t be rated higher than that situation.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which is why automatics have torque converters and manuals have clutches. It’s almost like we’ve come full circle or something!

        Millions and millions of vehicles are driving on the world’s roads right now, happily tooling along under the sound mechanical and physical principles known as “reality,” completely heedless of your apparent inability to understand it.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes and a manual can slip the clutch, it’s built for that. A torque converter can’t slip the lock, it’s not build for that, it has to stay open. And that generates a fuckton of heat.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            And? Come on, you’re almost there. Just two more neurons to put together:

            That’s why the transmission cooler is there.

            Wrap up: Your original claim that Americans “can’t” tow due to predominantly driving automatic transmission cars, in addition to being an uncreative and tired thinly veiled attempt at insulting Americans, is not only wrong but also prima facie absurd.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              And is the cooler in cars big enough to have noticeable towing capacity, or do you need a bigger one that only really fits a truck? How much additional radiator area do you need per additional ton of towing capacity (overcoming momentum, not tongue weight that can easily be zero just get a four-wheeled trailer)? For manuals, that’s zero additional radiator area. For automatics, I’ll leave the maths to you.

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                And is the cooler in cars big enough to have noticeable towing capacity

                Yes, it is. Do you realize that manufacturers publish a maximum towing capacity as part of their specifications for every vehicle? This is publicly available information, right there on the internet. It’s not a secret. The required surface area for the cooler is designed right in by the manufacturer for the transmission to work for the vehicle’s application. This not a case of something “extra” being added. It’s just how cars with automatic transmissions are built to begin with.

                The published towing capacity for most vehicles that are available in both automatic and stick are exactly the same. Would you care to guess why that is? You could have figured it out for yourself if you would bother to actually do some extremely minimal internet research instead of continuing to shoot your mouth off on whatever this ill-informed little crusade of yours is.

                Your initial claim is false. End of discussion. Just stop. You’re making a fool of yourself.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yes, it is. Do you realize that manufacturers publish a maximum towing capacity as part of their specifications for every vehicle?

                  And have you compared EU spec manuals vs. American model versions? When it comes to specs there’s another big difference which I didn’t mention: Tongue weight. Which isn’t towing capacity and EU spec trailers have drastically lower tongue weight for their rated carrying capacity: Because we actually pull loads with light vehicles. As already said, put four wheels on a trailer and the tongue weight is practically zero. Our trailers also come with brakes.

                  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    What, so now you’re trying to split hairs over the regulatory differences between the US and Europe to attempt to distract from the fact that you still haven’t addressed making the following demonstrably false statements?

                    • Your notion that automatic transmissions “need” active cooling that they “don’t” have when in fact they do, and
                    • Your claim that torque converters “can’t” be locked during acceleration when they provably regularly are, and
                    • Your claim that your engine “will stall” if the transmission can’t “slip” even while the vehicle is already in motion. (Hint: Get your car rolling, don’t touch the clutch, and take your foot off the accelerator pedal. Did it stall instantly? Did it stall when you got back on the accelerator, either? Of course it didn’t, because inertia is a process that exists.)
                    • Bonus points for blathering about “trying to slip the lock of the converter,” which also makes no sense because that’s not how torque converter lockups work nor attempt to work, nor has anyone proposed they work that way.

                    For the benefit of anyone else reading this, the difference in rated tow capacities between US spec and Euro spec vehicles is, as you have almost correctly observed, down to regulations and the trailer designs and not the tow vehicles themselves. There is no difference between the cars or their transmissions mechanically (nor the laws of physics – anywhere on the planet, I guarantee it). European regulations have two critical differences between the US, to wit:

                    1. Vehicles towing trailers are typically limited to ~60 MPH or the equivalent, whereas in the US they are not (at least outside of some specific state laws).
                    2. Tongue weight requirements are significantly lower, because nobody owns a body-on-frame truck which is necessary to support a high tongue weight.

                    This is because it is dangerous to tow a low tongue weight trailer at high speed. America has no such speed or tongue weight restriction, and we also have interstates with 85 MPH speed limits. Thus our target tongue weight is roughly 15% of the total load, largely in order to keep the trailer under control at speed and prevent it from snaking all over the place and rolling itself and the vehicle. All other things being equal this ultimately winds up in the tongue weight being the limiting factor for most unibody vehicles. If your tongue weight is limited at e.g. 200 pounds, which it is for my bog standard Subaru Crosstrek, solving for the estimated tow capacity assuming 15% of it is 200 lbs would be roughly 1333 lbs. What’s the US spec rated tow capacity of a Crosstrek? Oh wow, it’s 1500 pounds. Imagine that. (For both the manual and automatic/CVT versions, by the way.)

                    FYI, we also have trailer brakes over here, and many states require them to be used on loads exceeding 3000 pounds. Below that, the trucks most people use have adequate mass and braking capacity to handle towing trailer loads in and of themselves. It turns out, the actual reason Americans tow with trucks is because Americans tow with trucks, and our towing regulations and trailers are designed around the expectation of towing with trucks. It’s a just a cultural thing. No need to try to make it complicated nor make up fictitious bullshit about automatic transmissions.

                    But none of this has anything to do with your original assertions re: automatic vs. manual transmissions. I’m not arguing any other points with you.

                    As a matter of fact, I’m not arguing any more points with you at all. You have no idea how cars work. Go away.