• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Okay, most of this is fair play, but saying hunger games did it better? You take that back right now.

        • JoshCodes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Divergent just didn’t have the nuance, character depth or world building that the Hunger Games had and I’ll stand by that opinion. The divergent movie was a let down to tbh, the book was better. Still not as good as the hunger games tho.

          • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            Is the book version of the conspiracy better? I watched the first movie and thought that the supposedly smart caste was pretty braindead.

            • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              It seemed like the entire setup was pretty braindead honestly.

              Entertaining enough, but nowhere near plausible enough to really get invested in the story.

              Same with Hunger Games, honestly.

        • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Hunger Games depicted revolution’s harsh but necessary sides in a realistic way, and that elevates it above all other YA I’ve ever read. Granted I stopped reading YA novels after 16 but still.

          Katniss has a real personality, real desires, and loses things because she (thought) she decided to lead a revolution. Only to find out that she wasn’t in charge at all and only a figurehead at best, and herself became a victim of the revolution. Nonetheless the revolution was absolutely necessary.

          The world of the Hunger Games is much bigger than the teenage protagonists and that’s… missing in most of young adult fiction.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 days ago

            That’s why The Hunger Games was successful I believe. They treated the audience not as children, but as adults who can consider complex ideas. They just want to read about people their age. Most YA considers their audience as little more than hormone filled idiots.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Oh yeah. I take offense really at the implication that I would have watched it.