• moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Double negative confused me for a second and I was sad. Opposes the ban! Want gender affirming care available. Excellent.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 days ago

      Oh I missed that entirely. Sloppy writing, it should be arranged “opposes bans on gender affirming care”.

      • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Gotta get them clicks tho. Maybe we’re at the beginning of a transition from, “shocking and attention-grabbing headlines,” to, “attention-grabbing but also poorly written in a way that it’ll agitate an even wider wash of readers”

    • VoilaChihuahua@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Same! “Supports care” would have been an easier concept, though a little different from “opposes ban” I guess…

    • inspxtr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I find it quite common (and confusing) for certain news types like policy, eg “party A reverses the disapproval to oppose the once-unacceptable ban”