• BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I think it is good to point it out though. kbin.social is missing from the fediverse observer, but if you have a look at this: https://mbin.fediverse.observer/list you’ll see that almost all mbin servers have a >98% recent uptime and a >95% uptime over the whole lifetime of the server. Sadly, fedidb does not have an uptime metric

    (yes mine is not up there, because it was offline for a week in september last year)

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        A lot of the time it was technically ‘up’, but just non-functional/unusable.

        Most common for me was just not being able to do anything but look at the front page, couldn’t click on anything without errors.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          That is an excellent point - I so rarely went there but I thought I recalled that being my experience as well, and yet I wasn’t certain enough to say so. It really does mess with the stats if we are trying to use “server uptime” to compare between instances or Kbin vs. Mbin.

          • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            well server uptime is usually, and in the case of fediverse observer, coupled to a successful response. If the server spits out a 500 internal server error, that does not count as being up