Umm what does that even mean? How can anyone feel neutral to another human being?

I just meant indifferent really.

All I am picturing is you know someone exists but any amount of pain or pleasure they feel doesn’t impact you.

There are a lot of people that currently exist and are in pain but it has little to no impact on me even though providing help would require nothing more than some more time and manpower.

Like if you could push a magic button to make them happy you wouldn’t bother since that would require effort and you are neutral.

This, I think provides for an interesting thought-experiment. Do we know how long it takes to press a button? Is the button-press speed limited by the latency of the circuitry it’s connected to? Exactly how many people are currently in pain? It’s obviously lots but can we come up with a relatively specific number? With what frequency does the number of suffering people change?

Then there are also some questions with more relative ethical implications that might also be: How many hours a week should a person spend pressing this button? How many people should press this button? If all previously suffering people are getting their buttons pressed then how will we know when someone is happy and flourishing? Isn’t suffering an implied opposite of flourishing? What other implications of the anti-suffering button are there?

I don’t know the answer to these questions, but you have certainly given me lot’s to ponder.

[edit][post] On further research I guess this sounds kind of like Negative Ultilitarianism which appears to be a subset of Utilitarianism.