It’s a tale as old as time of Anarchists absolutely shitting all over communists but god damn I hateeeee it. No self awareness

Link to Instagram post

Edit: to be clear I don’t have a problem with Anarchists, just seems like very often MLs are met with so much vitriol with people they could collaborate with. Just sucks. Stupid interner

  • HexbearGPT [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    but which/whose plan is the right one?

    and how do you mediate between those with different plans who are all convinced that they are correct?

    these are the real questions.

        • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          It becomes evident during struggle what one’s are the most advanced. You use results to determine this. The most advanced proletarian movements in history are the USSR and other AES. They achieved the most power. Once another plan and type of communism gets further than that, they will become the default

    • betelgeuse [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      The science of revolution. It’s a process. A dialectic process. A means of understanding society through action and changing it through understanding. It’s like asking which is the right explanation for things, physics or chemistry? Biology or mathematics? They’re all different tools to tackle different problems in the attempt to understand the universe.

      Which experimental outcomes line up with reality? Those who achieved revolution. We know some plans worked in their context and some didn’t. We can formulate plans of our own for our own context. Those that lead to revolution are the right ones. Those that just lead to navel-gazing and academic debates are not correct.