• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    No one is disputing Trump said “very fine people on both sides”, which is what your link confirms. The false narrative was that he was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists which he doesn’t mention at all. Your clip doesn’t prove Trump was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists, unless you can show that everyone who was there protesting the removal was a neo-Nazis or white supremacists.

    • Doom@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lmfaoooo the gymnastics

      They were there, he referred to people there as very fine people and did not specify of the people there the nazis weren’t very fine people

      Get the absolute flippin heck out of here with your insane mental olympic level gymnastics

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They were there, he referred to people there as very fine people

        Were there other people there besides white supremists and meo-nazis opposing the tear down of the statue?

            • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              No. No reasonable person would define “very fine people” as those who venerate someone who fought a war for the purpose of maintaining the institution of slavery.

              I have not heard any argument that convinces me that such statues and monuments ought to be kept.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m not debating whether taking down the statue was right or not. My point of contention is that when Trump said very fine people there is no indication he was calling nazis and white supremists very fine people.

                • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah I understand the argument here: Somehow, mixed in among those white supremacists and nazis were some very fine people who just happened to find common cause with racists and fascists, but remained morally and ethically seperate from the groups they were marching together in the streets with. I find this assertion unconvincing.

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Is your argument that having any view similar to a white supremists or Nazi that makes you a white supremists or Nazi?

        • Doom@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If a nazi is sitting at a table with ten other people. You got a table of 11 nazis

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      People protested for many reasons. Lee was a decent general. Honestly he’s over hyped but he was better than grant. Per did some foolish things but if you’ve read about Lee it made sense. Lee wasn’t about the confederacy. He was about Virginia. As such he put to much emphasis on Virginia. That is just one example of why he was an amazing general.