• Baahb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    My parents weren’t executed horribly, what are you talking about about? I’m still talking about contemporary Christian belief. Thesis: You can consider yourself Christian without belief in Jesus as a historical figure. Many Christians are happy to understand Jesus as metaphors and an ideal. Like if you took the actually good Superman stories and removed all the context, you could idealize the individual to the point of worship without believing he’s real.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The whole point of Christianity isn’t just to “do good”. The foundation is that we aren’t good enough by nature and are flawed by our own fault, but by trusting in and following God, we can be forgiven. Because Jesus literally existed and was executed for our sins.

      • Baahb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That feels a lot like your personal interpretation. You do not get to decide how people who call themselves Christian define themselves.

        Fables are worth listening to for the morals they include. Why wouldn’t an ancient holy book be a moralistic guide to show the way to heaven, whatever that is which is not defined in scripture

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m going to start calling myself “muslim” then, as “muslim” means “one who submits to God”

          • Baahb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You go ahead and do that. Worth noting that Islam doesn’t have a protestant reformation thats come in to say “f this the rules are whatever I want them to be personally,” so it’s basically still in its Catholic hegemony phase.

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The protestant reformation didn’t do that. In fact, it was the opposite. It was based on the Bible over everything and shedding the idea of a pope who can claim “the rules are whatever I want them to be personally”

              • Baahb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                But that’s literally the second thing to happen in the protestant reformation. King Henry saw that Martin Luther guy and said “shit if he doesn’t have to listen to the Pope, I don’t either. Let’s strait up rewrite the Bible motherfucker!” So that the parts he didn’t like didn’t apply. Are you gonna say anglicans aren’t Christian?

                • Flax
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The reformers did not rewrite the Bible.

                  • Baahb@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Public education in US… Thanks for the correction.

                    Regardless… Mormons, JWs and Seventh Day Adventists get away with being Christian, so yah, I think you can get away with calling yourself a Christian and believing whatever you want.