• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well if that’s actually the functioning case, they are investing their effort in the wrong place. They don’t need energy production, they need storage.

    As far as your comment amount solar, we do have solutions that exist. Energy companies just need to actually get off their asses and work them into the grids.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nuclear Power Industry: “We need to invest $10B in nuclear plants!”
      Everyone else: “Why not just spend $1B on battery storage instead?”
      Nuclear Power Industry: “Nah, that’s not feasible.”

    • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Who would “they” be in that case? The people who’d like cheap energy do indeed need storage. The nuclear lobbies on the other hand need to cripple their competition, so they only need their own, already present facilities and whatever means they can get to sabotage upcoming competition and secure their primary position.

        • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          “The French”? The homogenous singular entity that all have one singular set of goals and no differences whatsoever? Or the Frrench people who’d like cheap energy or maybe the French electricity lobbyists? It’s not that simple.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      While a certain amount of pumped hydro energy storage is feasible, we will never have enough storage to

    • Dimantina@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah storage is sadly difficult and time consuming. I mean if we aren’t just using a crap ton of lith-ION.

      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sodium ion batteries are just about ready for mass production, they take up twice the amount of space as lithium but are just as effective and far cheaper

        • EveryoneDiesAlone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What is your source on that? I heard some news about china making some breakthroughs on sodium ion batteries but I am waiting for independent confirmation on that because, well china has let us down more often than not with “bleeding edge” tech.

          I was thinking molten salt would be a better energy sink for the here and now.

      • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hydrogen gets shit on loads, but this is exactly the kind of thing it can do pretty well. When you have excess, you don’t need to have to worry about efficiency in the same way. Then it’s ready to go once needed.