The world’s largest chipmaker promised to create thousands of US jobs. There are growing tensions over whether US workers have the skills or work ethic to do them.::Jobs at the TSMC semiconductor factory in Arizona could require long hours and total obedience. Americans may push back on the company’s culture.

  • marmarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What? Tech companies the world over have people on 24/7 on-call rotas, and it’s usually voluntary.

    Depending on the company, you might typically do 1 week in 4 on-call, get a nice little retainer bonus for having to have not much of a social life for 1 week in 4, and then get an additional payment for each call you take, plus time worked at x1.5 or x2 the usual rate, plus time off in lieu during the normal workday if the call out takes a long time. If you do on-call for tech and the conditions are worse than this, then your company’s on-call policies suck.

    I used to do it regularly. Over the years, it paid for the deposit on my first house, plus some nice trips abroad. I enjoyed it - I get a buzz out of being in the middle of a crisis and fixing it. But eventually my family got bored of it, and I got more senior jobs where it wasn’t considered a good use of my energies.

    Your internet connection, the websites and apps you use, your utilities - they don’t fix themselves when they break at 0300.

    If TSMC’s approach to on-call is bad, then yeah, screw that. I don’t see anything in the article that says that one way or the other. But doing an on-call rota at all is a perfectly normal thing to do in tech.

    • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, but tech workers get paid six figures and TSMC doesn’t want to pay the workers. This issue isn’t that Americans lack the skills. The issue is that TMSC doesn’t want to pay for skilled American labor. In Taiwan they don’t have to. This whole situation is why Thomas Friedman’s theory on globalization was wrong.

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The article mentioned employees being discouraged from claiming overtime, so I do wonder how they handle on call.

    • DigitalWebSlinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      A SaaS startup I used to work for tried to implement on-call rotations for their salaried engineers. No additional compensation was offered for the time you were on-call, and if you did get called, the policy was going to be essentially “take the next day off” - when we already had unlimited PTO. I was not happy, and made it known at the time. My manager mentioned that, being in a senior role, I might have the opportunity to excuse myself from the rotations. Ew.

      The effort didn’t end up going anywhere, but that’s been my sole experience so far with on-call efforts in software engineering.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      What? Tech companies the world over have people on 24/7 on-call rotas, and it’s usually voluntary.

      In my experience it’s never voluntary. Your shift is assigned based on a rotation and you really can’t opt out.