• 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [they/she]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 days ago

    The liberals will cause a constitutional crisis just to allow Trump to run.

    Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, Section 3:

    Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

    • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 days ago

      RIGHT!? Like, there are SO MANY options to prevent this, but they won’t DO any of them because they fundraise well against Trump and would rather wave the panic in front of their voters to keep them engaged.

      Very functional government.

      • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        5 days ago

        Crazy experience: I told the lib I work with that the democrats actually fund the crazier Republicans to encourage people to vote Democrat and he chuckled and said it’s a good strategy (and yes, he said this unironically).

        Libs who aren’t affected by this election aren’t very serious about it.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            5 days ago

            It does feel like the average democrat’s ignorant beliefs about the function and mechanics of government leave them mostly unable to understand how government actually functions.

            • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s a fairytale-level understanding. They believe stories, and know what should happen, and any evidence to the contrary is discarded.

              I found myself compelled to apologize to my partner repeatedly as I was teaching them to see past the veil; confronting and analyzing one’s beliefs is an extremely painful process when you’re doing it for the first time.

      • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [they/she]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Just to anticipate the libs for a second, section 5 puts the burden on Congress to enforce it as SCOTUS pointed out in Trump v. Anderson (2024). However, let’s not forget the Democrats had a trifecta in 2021-22 and could have pushed through legislation if they had wanted to ensure section 3 was applied/interpreted properly to this insurrection, which they easily should have been able to do — maybe even a resolution declaring Congress’ intent was that it already applied under some old law would have been enough.