MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-211 months agoAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-211 months agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 months agoWhat if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable? I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
minus-squareSheeEttin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months agoBecause you’re not generating the output. I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
minus-squareschroedingershat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoIf that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.
What if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable?
I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
Because you’re not generating the output.
I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
If that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.
Oh I love this take