• regul [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Those same judges would say it requires a constitutional amendment anyway, to which the response would just be “oh well”.

    • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      judicial review literally isn’t in the constitution either, just write their term limits into law and let them bitch about it while you wheel them out when their time is up

      • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is what drives me completely insane, they just invented their power and now they write opinions jerking the constitution off and trying to block anything that isn’t directly in the constitution. Any President worth half a shit would just tell them in the spirit of strict originalism or whatever they’re going back to the thing the constitution defined as their job: taking cases from swamped district courts that lack the manpower. If they don’t like it he can use their recent decision to justify drone striking them.