Alt text: (Epic Handshake format)

One guy is “Chromium browsers”

The other is “Firefox”

They’re agreeing on the same version numbers.

EDIT: formatting

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Once version numbers get this high and you have stable multi year development, you might as well switch to “2024.1” style versioning.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mostly so you can look at someone’s system and immediately know how many years old their software is.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does it work with LTS versions though?

      2022.27 LTS seems out of date but can be up to date.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I try (really hard) to not be as critical to them as I want to :).

        They are doing great work & rapid/up-to-date progress, maybe a bit of money would benefit FiFo & T-birb … and we might have not donated enough (or aren’t donating on a regular basis).

        But ads are a systemic problem, and we want to use that system (internet).

        We are being developed into a ferengi society.