• gmanlikescheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is specifically a school library, not a public library. And no, I do not support book-banning in any way, shape, or form. Just keeping the facts straight.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      And no, I do not support book-banning in any way, shape, or form.

      Just so you know, I didn’t think you did. I hope my response didn’t come across that way.

      • gmanlikescheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, not at all, I just think calling this socio-economic class-based is incorrect. Being in school is not a class (no pun intended).

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          To support the idea that it is class based, I suspect we will find it is being selectively applied to poorer communities, which specifically drives the most able-to-change-jobs (often the best) librarians to move to other communities where this is not being applied.

          I base my assumption on historic selective enforcement of other laws with similar vulnerability to abuse - such as selective enforcement during prohibition.

          I believe that if librarians, of any kind, are being targeted, we should suspect class warfare because libraries are historically a source of improved equity.

          So my assertion is that any action taken against any library should be examined carefully under a lens of suspected class warfare.