He is worried about a lack of (white) people on this planet.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Population collapse via infertility is by far the best thing that could happen for the planet. We need to dramatically reduce our consumption of natural resources back to the point where it is sustainable.

    • ram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It would also be the best way for humanity to end. It will eventually meet its doom, and if that’s because of infertility, we got off luckier than p much every dominant species the planet’s ever seen.

    • KrisND@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think he deserves some credit for making Mastodon and Lemmy more popular at least.

  • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    He’s from South Africa, which experiences some of the most extreme violence across racial and religious boundaries and was apartheid up until recently. White South Africans are notoriously racist.

  • Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The man just wants more warm bodies that he and his other rich crony friends’ companies can hire 14+ years down the road. It has nothing to do with race.

  • Sicktatties@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s because he and his ilk regard anyone who isn’t a billionaire as just a resource to be consumed and exploited. He’s just securing resources for the future. Excuse me while I puke.

  • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Longtermism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longtermism

    Humanity should do everything now to achieve the greatest possible happiness in a very distant future. Climate change, fascism, war, displacement and hunger - from the point of view of longtermism, none of this is important. What is important, for example: humanity should prevent the emergence of a machine superintelligence, a power that could destroy everything. And: Humanity should learn to colonise other planets, because the Earth will not last forever. (translated from a Netzpolitik.org article)

    This means “small” problems AI causes today do not count, spending money to get billionairs to space is progress. Caring for a doomed planet and keeping it from burning to a crisp isn’t as isn’t paying decent wages so people can afford children. They can focus on a far future and are bullet proof against criticism for not helping to solve current issues, because they are all in for humanity in 3000 years from now, living in space and we should thank them for that. Yeah. Take their money away, please.

    It is not just Elon Musk it is also Sam Altman (OpenAI) or Guillermo Söhnlein (co-founder of the firm behind the doomed Titan submersible) - now leading a project to create a floating colony of 1,000 people on Venus - just weeks after the disaster which killed five people.

    Nick Bostrom:

    In 2002, he published an essay on “existential risks” and wrote: "At present, in some places, there seems to be a negative correlation between intellectual performance and fertility. Bostrom fantasises about making people mentally and physically “healthier” through genetic manipulation. Obviously, the philosopher is describing a misanthropic view of the world in which people are judged on the basis of physical or mental characteristics. Bostrom also argues that genes play a central role in determining such characteristics. This view, known as “eugenics”, was used by the Nazis to justify genocide.

    These people are a threat to human kind and whatever they do is not meant to help today. They use their money to do everything BUT to change our society and planet for the better, they have already written us off.

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      For a deeper dive (and plenty of musk shit talking) this video from some more news does a pretty good dive into billionaires fucked up moral compass. Hint: it’s all racism and eugenics dressed up in shitty rhetoric

  • tal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Population collapse is the biggest threat to civilization,” accompanied by a list of countries where fertility rates are supposedly in decline

    They are in decline everywhere, and it is a serious issue at the levels that it has hit in many countries. It’s way, way below the ~2.1 TFR required to sustain a population, which means you wind up with an inverted population pyramid, and a lot of old people needing to be supported by a few young people.

    Europe isn’t actually the worst-off place – South Korea, Japan, and East Asia plummeted down even sooner.

    Take a look, at, say, South Korea:

    https://www.populationpyramid.net/republic-of-korea/2023/

    And governments haven’t generally had a lot of luck with pulling it up with policy changes.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      No. The world population is at 7.8 billion and on a steady increase.

      What Musk, and hopefully not you, is worried about is the decline in white people being born.

      • ram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What Musk, and hopefully not you, is worried about is the decline in white people being born.

        What’s the source of this claim? It certainly isn’t this article that doesn’t provide any proof besides wild speculations.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are nearly 8 billion people on this Earth. Most of them aren’t white. The number of white people is regularly decreasing. So where is this population crisis exactly? Unless you think it’s a crisis that we’re running out of white people.

          • ram@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s a leap of logic. You are saying that since the human population is not collapsing on a global scale, the decline of population of particular countries is not a problem at all and you somehow associate a donation made by Musk to address this issue with racism. Even the author of the article admits she doesn’t know exactly what the money is being used for:

            The specificities of what Musk’s $10 million will accomplish remain unclear, beyond Bloomberg’s report that PWI will use it to research fertility, economic growth, and the future of the human population.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              He didn’t specify particular countries. He said that population collapse is the greatest threat to civilization (wonder who’s civilization he’s talking about there) and that there is a real population crisis.

              If he meant specific countries, why did he not say so?

              But sure, the guy who grew up in apartheid South Africa with a father who exploited black workers in an emerald mine and whose car company has repeatedly had problems with racism, the guy who once said that U.S. media and schools were racist against white and Asian people isn’t even a little bit racist.

              Believable.

              • ram@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                If he meant specific countries, why did he not say so?

                The tweet from Musk that this article refers to is a response to another tweet that did mention specific countries, ie: Japan, US, China, Singapore, UK, Italy and South Korea. Half of them are primarily non white.

                But sure, the guy who grew up in apartheid South Africa with a father who exploited black workers in an emerald mine and whose car company has repeatedly had problems with racism, the guy who once said that U.S. media and schools were racist against white and Asian people isn’t even a little bit racist.

                He may very well be a racist, but this article makes a piss poor job to demonstrate the donation was influenced by racism.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The tweet from Musk that this article refers to is a response to another tweet that did mention specific countries, ie: Japan, US, China, Singapore, UK, Italy and South Korea. Half of them are primarily non white.

                  But they are Asian and he’s good with Asians as I already showed you.

                  Note none of them are countries with high black or brown populations. Can’t imagine why the tweet or Musk weren’t concerned about those.

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The world population is at 7.8 billion and on a steady increase.

        It will, however, soon reach a peak and then enter decline. However, that’s not the relevant factor – people in Country A aren’t going to cover pensions or education subsidies or the like in Country B. You need individual countries to have something on the order of a sustainable population. That means that the combination of fertility and immigration (if the country has positive immigration; some countries, like many of those in Eastern Europe, have serious net outflow) needs to be sufficient to sustain that country’s population.

        You can do some of it with immigration, and in the US, we’ve done quite a bit, but as can be seen by the political response to the European migrant crisis – a swing to the far right – populations get pissy when one pulls in more than a certain rate of immigration. So there’s only so much you can do via immigration.

        EDIT: Oh, if you were responding to my comment as to “decrease”, I was responding to a comment about fertility rate decrease, which is what the article said – that is decreasing everywhere. I’m not saying that population is decreasing everywhere, not yet.

        where fertility rates are supposedly in decline

        They are in decline everywhere

        The world population is at 7.8 billion and on a steady increase.

        Global population will start to decrease as a result of that too. But that’s a trailing factor.

        • gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          populations get pissy when one pulls in more than a certain rate of immigration.

          So they’ll shrink and get problems. Either they learn from that and let immigrants in or they’ll die out completely. This might be a problem on a national level, but not on a global one.