☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to History@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoDocuments reveal Clinton forced Yeltsin into signing NATO-Russia pactwww.peoplesworld.orgexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down13cross-posted to: history@lemmygrad.mlhistory@hexbear.net
arrow-up117arrow-down1external-linkDocuments reveal Clinton forced Yeltsin into signing NATO-Russia pactwww.peoplesworld.org☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to History@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: history@lemmygrad.mlhistory@hexbear.net
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·4 months agoThe link is in the article. Georgetown University | National Security Archive: NATO-Russia charter 1997 was “forced step,” said Yeltsin. Links to the declassified FOIA documents are in there.
minus-squareAussiemandeus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·4 months agoI just read through the documents. What you linked to just again says “shows released documents” I found sources that say there are two arguments on what went down during the meetings. The meetings themselves just have an agenda and no transcripts.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 months agoIn the span of 15 minutes you read the 18 FOIA PDF documents containing about 130 pages and came to that conclusion? Okay.
minus-squareAussiemandeus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·4 months agoI read the ones pertaining to the meetings. They’re short cause they’re all but blank. It’s not up to Ms to refute the claims br brining the evidence. The person making the claim needs to provide the evidence
The link is in the article. Georgetown University | National Security Archive: NATO-Russia charter 1997 was “forced step,” said Yeltsin. Links to the declassified FOIA documents are in there.
I just read through the documents. What you linked to just again says “shows released documents”
I found sources that say there are two arguments on what went down during the meetings.
The meetings themselves just have an agenda and no transcripts.
In the span of 15 minutes you read the 18 FOIA PDF documents containing about 130 pages and came to that conclusion? Okay.
I read the ones pertaining to the meetings. They’re short cause they’re all but blank. It’s not up to Ms to refute the claims br brining the evidence.
The person making the claim needs to provide the evidence