• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What I’m going to say has nothing to do with the Algerian boxer, she was born a woman and if we started banning athletes from the Olympics whose rare genetics gave them an advantage, there’d be no reason to watch.

    trans women are actually at a competitive disadvantage since hormone blockers also nullify the low levels of Testosterone that women produce naturally.

    That is objectively false for combat sports. Blockers do not reverse the years of effects that testosterone has on their bodies development, such as skeletal structure and bone density.

    I don’t understand this insistence on denying reality for the very niche topic of trans women competing in combat sports, it is dangerous.

    If you don’t believe me, go listen to the interviews of female MMA fighters who Fallon Fox destroyed, and I’m talking like fractured skulls.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll preface this with saying I am a contract absolutionist and the boxers in question qualified according to the IOC rules so I 100% support their participation and/or wins. I do want to point out:

      1. Neither of these 2 are trans. They are DSD. Born and raised female their entire lives.

      2. While I agree there are some long term developmental advantages that androgen blockers do not mitigate as far as I can tell all actual Trans athletes that previously qualified failed to do so after taking any requisite blocker regimen which, inconclusively FTR, strongly suggests they do mitigate most of the key advantages here.

      That said, I do not agree with the IOC (and/or the relevant preceding governing bodies) being so inclusive for the female competition categories. But for a dysfunction in typical fetal development she would have been AMAB and squeaking into eligibility on a technicality is just a bad look any way you objectively look at it.

      Prevalence of AIS in the population: 0.006%

      Prevalence of Medallists in the Woman’s Welterweight category: 33%

      While scientifically inconclusive this statistic supports the need for further hypothesis testing lest 49.994% of the population be relegated obsolete.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago
        1. I’m aware that the Olympic boxer has DSD, and that it’s prevalent in an outsized portion of female combat sports athletes. I’m still of the opinion that they should not be discriminated against for using their genetic condition to their advantage in becoming a world class athlete. I see this as no different from how Michael Phelps has a condition where he produces a lot less lactic acid.

        2. If you were implying that the Olympics should start genetic testing of athletes and screening them for these types of conditions, I am entirely against that, see my previous response.

        Did you miss the part where I was very clearly and specifically talking about the case of trans women combat sports athletes? Those who had male levels of testosterone during their body’s development and who then transitioned.

        This is a very niche subject, but for some reason people like the user I was responding to, insist on pretending that puberty as a male doesn’t matter if the adult athlete is on blockers, and that it does not give them an advantage in a combat sport. I’m not so much concerned about the advantage itself, as I am about the inherent danger to the other participants.

        Striking blows from a musculature developed in male levels of testosterone, present an outsized risk of death, or permanent injury, to a female fighter/boxer. A risk that is significantly higher than the normal risks associated with combat sports.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      You just pulled the case of the single most violent form of combat sports out of your ass to justify being a discriminatory fuckwad.

      How hard is it to just stop being a fuckwad? Why do people keep insisting on making “I want to keep being a fuckwad!” their hill to die on?

      Do you get some kind of high from this dumb shit? Does it make you feel big to know that you’re just pissing all over people trying to live their lives for no reason except that ya just don’t like them for some fucking reason with no basis in any form of reality except the one you made up for the purpose of getting to keep hating them?

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No, I cited a very specific and highly relevant scientific rationale, and then followed up with an example of what happens when you choose to ignore that reality for the sake of, whatever it is you believe you’re doing.

        Combat sports are combat sports…MMA, boxing, etc., they’re COMBAT sports.

        But I can tell from your ignoring the scientific reality of the situation, and choosing instead to call me a discriminatory fuckwad, that you’re someone who should be taken seriously. Clearly I’m not up to that task…

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even in a section of internet that is massively pro lgbtq, you’re being down voted for saying such utterly ignorant things.

        Muscle mass completely aside, men are designed to punch better than women. The hips, arm length, and size of their hands are all better for combat sports and hormone treatment doesn’t take any of that away.

        You don’t sound pro Trans so much as you sound anti cis. Like you just hate most of the population.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “wah wah wah not being allowed to make up science to justify bullshit discrimination is anti-cis discrimination!”

          You literally just tried to “reverse racism” this argument because it offended you that much that literally no actual science backs up the notion that trans women are anything but women.

          That’s where this whole argument comes from, the absolutely desperate twisted angst of the transphobe to find any way at all to rear the false notion that trans women are anything but women.

          Fuck the chromosomes fuck the obsession with not knowing how hormones work, fuck all the armchair biologists with Facebook University medical degrees specializing in sexual dimorphism, and fuck you trying to bring bone shape into this argument as if the phrenologists aren’t there in the background being a glaring example about why listening to that logic gets us nowhere but genocide town in a blink.

          They’re women, they’re just as much women as cis women, letting them into women’s spaces isn’t abusing cis women, it is letting women into women’s spaces.

          That’s what the actual science says, eat shit and die mad about it if you refuse to accept just not being a transphobic rancid skunk anus about letting people just be who they say their identity is.