• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Make it 2 classes, open and restricted.

    Clear rules on who is allowed in the restricted class.

    Edit People down voting, do you not want a restricted class?

    • Veneroso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      When it’s a cis woman you’re worried about against other cis women? No? I’m starting to think that we should have civics tests to use the Internet…

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        It seems that, going forward, a stricter definition and (private and respectful) testing of cis categorisation would reduce the pain and suffering (from armchair commentators like ourselves) of all future competitors at top levels of womens sports.

        • Veneroso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Umm is the person in the correct weight class for this event? Yes. Okay next!

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            For the “men’s” event, yes. Weight is the only restriction. Women should be able to fight in the men’s event if they qualify.

            For the women’s classification there must be a clear line drawn somewhere between “has given birth” and “changed their name to Sue”.

            (I have no preference exactly where that line is drawn)