• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting. I had assumed it went like the other 133 that source mentions.

    Wonder if there’s just an extremely over-sized overlap between conservatives who were going to be offended about and willing to boycott and people who drink cheap beer that led to that statistically unusual outcome.

    Also maybe cheap beer is cheap beer and there’s limited enough brand loyalty that other types of products don’t?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think there was any real strong attachment to it. It was a recognizable go-to cheap beer. But nowadays there’s dozens of cheap light beers, and seltzers, and mixed drinks in a can, and ciders, and I can go on.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It was the fact that Bud Light openly advertised using a trans person. It was an image that could be flaunted and would rally even moderate republicans.

      An executive respectfully writing a response detailing why they would not want their brand associated with a platform that had extreme right wing views is much harder to rally around…

      Fundamentally it’s because there is no convenient image to rally behind… they would have to read and think to be outraged.

      • Vanon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        When they figure out how to use AI to generate picture book propaganda for their followers, watch out. (Wait, is that why they are obsessed with meme images…)