The exchange is about Meta’s upcoming ActivityPub-enabled network Threads. Meta is calling for a meeting, his response is priceless!

  • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    they could make their own custom version of the fediverse, slowly diverging from the core open source version, then push the actual fediverse into obscurity, the same way Google Chat killed XMPP. Imagine a new Meta-controlled “fediverse” where you can only have an instance if you use their code and their rules.

      • longshaden@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        this was an excellent article. I’m old enough to remember being impacted by these events.

        I’m not in Munich, but I remember trying to embrace OpenOffice, and telling my wife how pissed off I was that Microsoft wasn’t following it’s own open source document standard.

        I remember Google killing XMPP, and there’s also the more recent examples of what Facebook has done to WhatApp, Instagram, and the other potential competitors that got buried.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In other words they’re trying a new way to turn the fediverse into the metaverse.

      That makes about the most sense It possibly can.

    • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      they could make their own custom version of the fediverse

      I mean, they already did and it’s called “Facebook” (and “Instagram”)? Are people forgetting that Fediverse apps are being developed as an alternative to the existing commercial “social media”? Meta is already heavily invested in keeping users on their platforms and killing alternatives. This is 100% an attempt to do that. They just added a pair of Groucho glasses to it and think people won’t see through the flimsy disguise.

      • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, of course not. You didn’t have to use Google chat either, but here we are. I never used it but ICQ is still dead. My point is that the billion dollar companies have more power than just making instances. Once their instances have features that the rest of the fediverse doesn’t, people will be motivated to use their version instead because “it’s more convenient and I can talk to my friends.”

          • llama@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they do it better without contributing the improvements back to the standard then that’s something to complain about. Because then all they’re doing is a different, better, proprietary standard and they never really had any intention of embracing an open source project.

            • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              …and they never really had any intention of embracing an open source project.

              Well, FOSS. Open source projects can still be proprietary, as just because you can see the source code doesn’t mean you have legal permission to use it as you wish.

              Anyway, there’s a simple rule about this: capitalist corporations NEVER have the intention of embracing FOSS. Like, people want to give M$ lots of credit for contributing to the Linux kernel for a while, but the truth is that their motivation for doing so wasn’t to improve on Linux, but to gain advantage for their own hypervisor (and then cloud) platform. They’d tried to take over the web server space with Windows Server and realized it was never going to happen, so they took a step lower and tried to get every instance of Linux-based web servers running on Azure. Tailoring the Linux kernel for their brand of virtual environment was NOT done for the benefit of Linux developers or users.

          • longshaden@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that they might do something better.

            It’s that they have a history of encouraging the competition to adopt an open standard (to gain the active users), and then purposely scuttling the standard in order to sink the competition (and leave the users with no functioning alternative).