• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    ·
    4 months ago

    Trump was manipulated into attacking Adelson by another donor, Ike Perlmutter, who “had hoped in vain that Mrs. Adelson would contribute to a rival super PAC that he backs.”

    It’s like narcissistic parents trying to undermine each other by manipulating their child.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And because Trump only has the attention span to believe the last person he talked to, he took Perlmutter at his word and went off on someone else.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    4 months ago

    Trump accusing billionaire supporter Miriam Adelson, the widow of the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, of allowing the PAC she has funded with millions of dollars, Preserve America, to be run by “Republicans in Name Only,” also known as RINOs.

    This sounds like another felony to add to the list. PACs are not allowed to coordinate with candidates or their campaigns, which is how they’re allowed to raise unlimited amounts of money. Trump directing how the PAC be run sure does sound like coordination to me.

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        2 in 46 US-Presidents are addicted to crime. You can help now. For only a small amount, you can feel like you have done something.

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      PACs are not allowed to coordinate with candidates or their campaigns, which is how they’re allowed to raise unlimited amounts of money.

      If anyone doesn’t get that stuff like this is always said with a nod and a wink… they don’t understand how truly broken our campaign finance system is in reality. The Citizens United case is blinding proof that this Supreme Court has been in the bag for conservatives and reactionaries for decades. Project 2025 is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the wealthy, empowered by Reagan era Neoliberalism, attempting a fascist takeover of the United States. It’s the Business Plot (or “Wall Street Putsch”) of 1933, but in super slow motion.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    4 months ago

    “The texts were particularly jarring because Mrs. Adelson and Mr. Trump had a friendly meeting just a week earlier at the Republican National Convention, according to a person briefed on the matter,” the report notes before adding that Trump was manipulated into attacking Adelson by another donor, Ike Perlmutter, who “had hoped in vain that Mrs. Adelson would contribute to a rival super PAC that he backs.”

    Everyone involved seems awful

  • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This guy is just too old. He’s lost it. Just a weird racist rapist with 34 felonies. He should be seeking treatment, not an election. It’s embarrassing.

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      4 months ago

      I resent the idea of judging people by their age, whether Biden or Trump. You can reach 80 and be fine. The problems with Biden and Trump are not their age but their attitude and cognitive abilities (which correlates with age but you know what they say about correlation).

      I agree with everything else.

      Let’s stop this fucked up ageism. It is not his age. It’s his 34 (or however many) felonies.

      • TrippyHippyDan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        But there’s a certain point where your age does matter when you’re trying to do what is said to be the most stressful job on the planet.

        The stress from the job is just going to make them have those cognitive decline faster at the age that they’re at.

        So age does matter. Where it should not be the only marker, it should be included in the decision.

        Also, there’s already a limit on how old you have to be to run for president. There should be a top end as well for the same reasons you are no longer reflecting the majority of your peers at that point.

        And when you consider most 80 year olds don’t understand technology at all, and I haven’t met any 80 year olds that were up to date, it is a big factor.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I never said age doesn’t matter. All I said is that some effects that come with aging are problematic and since all people age differently, they should be judged on their own basis. We have tests for cognitive decline… no need to use stupid methods like picking an age and drawing a line.

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Tests for cognitive decline aren’t worth shit if we don’t actually 1) use them, 2) believe their results, 3) implement legal procedures to remove a president whose cognition has deteriorated, and 4) actually use (read: enforce!) those legal procedures.

            But wait, there’s more! Cognition is complex and cognitive decline is gradual. I’m not sure that the existing tests (e.g., the NPI-C, IQCODE) are sensitive enough to measure the very onset of decline, which is what I’d want for a president. It’s safer to set the maximum age for presidency below the median age at onset of cognitive decline, which is roughly 70 per Hale et al (see doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100577).

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Onset of decline sounds good but how were these studies able to tell where it starts if they were not adequate at testing it (because your claim is we cannot test it so easily so we should rely on the mean age provided by studies that test it… sounds like going in a circle to me)?

              So why not have cognitive tests and a committee of experts. It’s the President we are talking about. Surely science can whip something up other than “70 BBAAAAAD, 50 OKAAAY”. You could be 35 with mental illnesses that affect your job. You could be 50 and a heavy drinker. Why stop at the age limit if we can disqualify unqualified candidates elsehow? Why use the “safer” dumbass cutoff limit when we can use the “more fair” approach of testing people individually? Why not use the cutoff limit to say “during these years, we test the President even more on cognition”?

              But yeah I agree, nothing works if people won’t implement it. And whose fault is that?

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I replied to someone else about the same thing. Remove it and replace it with cognitive tests.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah if you’ve watched a relative age you can watch the decline happen.

        Sure some people over 70 are still quite sharp but they are definitely the exception.

        I would argue even 60 is too old. Fortunately I’m in Canada and our leaders are pretty young all around.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I can’t see how one can set any kind of hard line when it’s clear that exceptions are plently. We have better healthcare and will love longer. Better get used to this.

      • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you mind if I ask what your thoughts are about the minimum age to become president? I’m not trying to be combative. I’m just curious what you think (personally I think 35 is really high to be a minimum)

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think those should also be removed. I think being a suitable candidate for presidency means being cognitively fit and have good campaigning and debates. At this 70 or 80 cutoff we lose people like Bernie and I’m sure we are losing out on a lot of potentially good candidates younger than 35.

      • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh it’s age. At 80 you can literally die at any second. That’s now what you want or need in a leader. Nobody at 80 has the wit and reflexes the did 20 years ago. 70 is pushing it.

        • rezifon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can literally die at any second no matter what your age. That doesn’t seem like a well-considered criterion.

          • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m no scientist but I’m going to go ahead and say with confidence that when you 80, your chances of not waking up are exponentially higher than someone younger.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it’s those 34 felonies that don’t matter tho. We allow felons to run for a very good reason and it’s pretty big insurance that a wannabe dictator can’t just achieve full takeover by having all his opponents convicted of crimes.

        Age on the other hand… Even the healthiest 80yo can go on a sudden decline.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love seeing Trumpanzees turning on each other. They are some of the worst people on the planet. When they cause each other harm everyone else wins.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      When they cause each other harm everyone else wins

      For some reason, this really hit me. I generally don’t root for actual harm to befall someone. I just don’t think you can do that and call yourself a good person. That said, I do genuinely enjoy the schadenfreude in stories like this.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m the opposite. I don’t think you can be a good person and not root for actual harm to befall Donald, or McConnell, or Clarence, or Elon, or etc. They’re all sociopaths who are willing to burn the planet for money in a way that is beyond the reach of justice.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The Adelson family is horrible. Here’s an article about the patriarch who recently passed. Massive right-wing donor. Got deals from people like Newt Gingrich to shut down investigations into the gambling industry (where a bunch of Adelaon money came from), used far-right anti union operatives, like trump he deliberately stiffed contractors who worked on his business properties…just read the article. The Adelsons are scumbags.

    Do not feel bad for the lady. She helped build this monster and was supporting it.

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    Poor guy, he can’t make all of his mega-donors happy. It’s a damn shame when you don’t really have a platform or any solid principles. You just end up pandering to whoever will pony up. Dance Donny, dance.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    The NYT shows the texts included a nice bit of misogyny. I’d say what a piece of shit Trump is, but he even let an aide write those texts haha

    “RINOs” — Republicans in name only — and that Mrs. Adelson’s late husband would never have tolerated that, the people said.

  • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Aging is sad, especially when it happens to those you love. But I think we can all admit that old guys get real weird as they approach their mortal expiration. I’ve unfortunately seen the mood swings and complete lack of couth as the mind degrades in the final years.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its not age, its a narcisist in meltdown over losing his image, his control, and the fear of those around him.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This guy was a gleefully inhuman monster who hurt people for fun decades before he was even President.

      Just as with Ronald Reagan, some people just do so much harm to others unrepentantly for fun and profit, that I can very much revel in their pain/decline/confusion and sleep like a baby.

      I don’t subscribe to the pure model of “treat others as you would have them treat you.” Humans abuse that and it makes you a mark.

      My version is “In a vacuum, be kind, but once someone shows you who they are, treat others how they treat others.”

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, when someone shows you who they truly are, believe them the first time. I’ve become a person for whom respect is not earned, it is only ever lost. Everyone I know and meet, I try to respect the same as I would any other person… but, once you’ve lost that respect, I find it truly hard to give the benefit of the doubt and restore that faith.

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Admit? People get weird when they age? Any studies to back this up at all? I live in Sweden where a large portion of the population is quite old. You have those who need care, and you have those who are just fine (like anyone in any age group). I’m surprised to see this kind of agesim BS on Lemmy tbh. Are we really stupid enough to judge the competence of a person based on how many times we rotated the sun? Please. There is plenty to hate about Trump. The passing of time is not one of them.

      P.S: I think your attitude sucks and I hope that when/if you hit 80, you have people around you that don’t have this attitude so they don’t bin you into early grave my metaphorically killing you before you are dead.

      • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who pissed in your Cheerios, brother? I said that its sad to see the mental decline and personality changes of loved ones in their final years. I get that aging affects everyone differently. I hope those around me in my final years, don’t see a shell that differs from the person I presented the world, throughout my healthy life. I hope the same for you and the ones you love as well.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The agists did.

          Ps. I am extremely sad to see left leaning progressives go all bananas about sexism and racism but just embracing ageism as if that is somehow acceptbale.

          Saying that age is an indicator of cognitive decline is not ageist. Saying things like “this person is TOO OLD and TOO FARTY to be president” is. This is what my problem here is with.

          Saying a President cannot be above 80 is like saying women should not be firefighters (or some other similar sexist nonsense). Neither people can control their age or gender, but they sure as fuck can prove themselves as competent in a certain field and this is what we should be judging.

          We’re not in the fucking bronze age. No need to draw lines in sand and say “80 BAAAAD”. PLEASE. Let’s just be a tadfuck more sophisticated than that. Millions of years of evolution, we can be a fair fucking society can’t we?

  • FUBAR@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    One would hope that someone so easily manipulated won’t get to be president

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just don’t believe the story. Nobody in the world would be stunned if Trump treated them like crap, because he’s done it to so many people that supported him over the years.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      This irks me a bit too.

      Once in a while, I see a short video clip of “Why I’m not voting for Trump this time”. They give some good reasons - narcissism, brash rudeness, looking out for himself, etc. Of course, I salute people for having their moment of introspection. But what annoys me is, none of their reasons were less true in 2016 - and few of them ever really say they themselves changed in the intervening span.

      Goalpost one is to stop supporting the guy. I’m glad for people that hit that. Goalpost two is to realize a reasonable person never should’ve supported him. Perhaps that’s a lot for some people.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh but surely those people had said something to get such an aggressive response or they weren’t actual supporters in the first place, some were probably leftist moles, not me though, I support him, he will fix the US! /s

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Stories like this are proof that we need to get over our child-like worship of billionaires. Money is no proof of intelligence.