• Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A more accurate depiction of raptors would have them with feathers, they’d basically look more like large birds, but with normal jaws and teeth instead of beaks.

    Also many of the classical depictions, also known as skin wrapped or shrink-wrapped aren’t really great because they don’t attempt to depict the animal how they were by reconstructing they just draw skin over the structure of the bones, which is very wrong living things have cartilage and structure in their bodies that aren’t bone so we constructing from bone requires imagining and attempting to recreate that structure while using the bone structure as a starting point.

      • ilex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        So my fan fiction IS based in science! Do you think they were good kissers? I like to think so.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Another meme really made me think about this, how would scientist in the future reconstruct a hippo? How accurate would we be with just the skeleton?

      And how accurate are we now with dinosaurus?

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Really depends on how they do it if they do the shrink wrapping technique it’ll be just as bad, if they try and use context clues and imagination it’ll probably be a bit better, probably never 100% unless they find fossilized flesh (which is extremely rare).

        As for how accurate it is with dinosaurs it’s gotten better, discovery of certain fossilized feathers has given clues to how they looked, even allowing us to theorize about what colors some of their feathers might have been because the pigments in feathers have different Crystal structures, so in a well preserved fossilized feather they can see the shapes of those structures, obviously the color is long gone but because those shapes are unique to the pigments they can infer what color it was.

        There are small details that are never going to be quite right, we have though come a long way from where we were.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I think it also depends on the mammals that exist in this hypothetical future. If there is a similar species they would likely use it as reference. What’s the deal with dinos? They have teeth, tails, and eggs so people were like “lizard”?

          More and more we think bird because of the evidence of feathers but what if feather boas were just the style back then?