• Jrockwar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Absolutely not comparable to floppy disks. The hands are a representation, not a technology. Technology-wise, most modern “analog” wristwatches are quartz, and therefore digital, not actually analog. Yet we choose to make them with hands because that provides a better representation of the passing of time.

      • Jrockwar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The reason is better is because a number on its own doesn’t provide any representation whatsoever of the passing of time. It represents the current observed time, but it does nothing to represent graphically how much of the day is left.

        The arguably best representation of the passing of time is a 24h analogue watch/clock, even if that has its own set of issues which make it a terrible way of displaying the current time.

          • Faresh@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It goes beyond just showing what part of day you are in. Everything is reduced to angles. You don’t have to do any math with numbers, just look how much the pointer has to move to see how much time is left until an event you are interested in, and you get to visually compare that angle with the entire half of a day to get an even better perception of the passage of time.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Technology-wise, most modern “analog” wristwatches are quartz, and therefore digital, not actually analog.

      Wat… that’s not how that works. Quartz watches can be digital or analog but what matters is whether it has a digital display or analog hands.