I do not have and addiction problem, you have a problem with my addiction.

  • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    In case of && , the second process waits for the first process to finish with error code 0, before it starts.

    In case of &, the second process starts without waiting for the first to finish. Meaning, by the time you are looking at the GUI, the exit command has already been executed.

    • stanka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Right. Yeah I didn’t engage my brain on the & initially as i thought it was just a typo. But that should work, seems others on the internet think the same.

      I like ‘exec startx’, but really if someone has physical access, unless you are doing a lot of other security, you can’t be safe.

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 个月前

        I tend to be lucky in that regard, as people around me who might get physical access, tend to not have Linux know-how, even if they think of pranking me.

        Also, I lock my room.