Water companies are allowing important natural landscapes they own to fall into disrepair, data shows, with only 16% of sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) under their control in good condition.

The companies have been accused of “polluting for profit” by not investing to improve the status of their SSSIs.

Charles Watson, the chair of River Action, said: “Nothing demonstrates better the appalling environmental record of our polluting water companies than the fact that they are not even taking care of the highly protected areas that they actually own. It simply cannot be right that the payment of large dividends to shareholders and huge bonuses to bosses is prioritised before protecting SSSIs. This entire culture of polluting for profit must end.”

  • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    They shouldn’t be allowed to own them in the first place. If you allegedly can’t afford to fix your infrastructure, how can you be expected to pay the upkeep of these sites?