https://futurism.com/the-byte/government-ai-worse-summarizing

The upshot: these AI summaries were so bad that the assessors agreed that using them could require more work down the line, because of the amount of fact-checking they require. If that’s the case, then the purported upsides of using the technology — cost-cutting and time-saving — are seriously called into question.

  • impartial_fanboy [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    8·
    2 months ago

    I do think people here have a tendency to just hate all of it out of hand, which I get to some extent.

    Yeah the hype cycle is certainly annoying. As is the accompanying fire/re-hire at lower pay cycle that follows any automation.

    ignoring the fact that it can render pretty amazing looking videos in such a short time span.

    I actually think the generative aspect of neural networks is the least interesting/useful/innovative/etc. Though it will admittedly be more interesting when an LLM can say, use blender to make a video rather than just wholesale generating it. Or at least generate the files/3d models necessary to have it be edited by a person just like they would anything else. I suspect there will have to be a pretty significant architecture change for them to be able to make convincing/coherent movie-length videos.

    Chaotic system control, like they’re doing with nuclear fusion plasma is the most interesting, to me anyway.