The “Readers added context” feature is the only good thing about Twitter.

  • bermuda@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not just advocate for both services having a block feature.

    We’re users, not Lemmy creators. This would be like criticizing Instagram users for using a Facebook service when it’s Facebook and Zuckerberg who are the problems.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there’s no real way to implement blocking on a decentralized platform without severely increasing overhead per post, plus it’d be super easy for any instance to ignore it. I meant what i said when I claimed to understand why it’s not on the fediverse. It’s a logistical nightmare that would greatly increase the server requirements to host and defeat the intent.

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But I still don’t see why this makes users the hypocrites.

        I also know why it’s not on the fediverse but that doesn’t mean I support the lack of blocking.

    • SomeoneElseModOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree but I think you’ve got confused with your analogy - meta owns Facebook and Instagram.

        • SomeoneElseModOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries, it’s hard it keep up! I was going to use Pinterest in an example but couldn’t remember if they were owned by someone else 🤷🏼‍♀️