The “Readers added context” feature is the only good thing about Twitter.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about? Why would I complain to an admin? Dangerous when Elon does what?
    You’re a nutcase.

      • SomeoneElseMod
        shield
        OPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Arguing is against the rules of this community. I’m going to nuke this whole thread because it’s becoming nasty and that’s not welcome here either. Please read the rules and make sure you don’t break them again or you will be banned. Thank you.

        • mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Arguing” means letting people know how block actually works on Twitter? The post is misleading, and people should know what block actually means in the context of Twitter.

          Are you going to tell this to the people calling me an idiot over and over? That’s actually hostile, very different than just contributing to the conversation letting people know what the feature actually does.

          If you want to ban me, fine, but I’m calmly informing people. It’s the reaction I’ve got, from being mass downvoted for giving context, and repeatedly getting name-called that should be seen as the problem.

          • SomeoneElseMod
            shield
            OPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I warned the person who called you names and deleted their posts. What other people do or say isn’t an excuse for you to break the rules, it’s each individual’s responsibility to follow the rules of the community, the instance, and lemmy.

            I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. That includes arguing for arguments sake and provoking arguments. According to lemmys code of conduct, users should report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

            I gave you a soft warning for being argumentative with me with your “are you going to get mad at” comment you made to me personally earlier. This is your final warning; if you break the rules again you will be permanently banned from this community.

            • mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is a serious question, if it’s bad that Twitter does it, is it also bad that lemmy work this way?

              If you have a double standard and want to ban people that point it out, go ahead. Consistency is important.

              I can see why you are upset Twitter is removing blocks, because censoring people that point out your own hypocrisy is how you deal with problems.

              • SomeoneElseMod
                shield
                OPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Once again, I genuinely don’t know what you’re talking about now. I explained in another thread why I personally think lemmy/Reddit is different from other social media, but we’re not talking about that now, I’m talking to you as a moderator for breaking the rules in your replies to someone else. That’s why I distinguished these comments as “from the moderator”.

                I’m not upset with Twitter, I don’t use it to tweet myself. I’m not being a hypocrite and I’m not banning anyone because they disagree with me. I’m banning you because you’ve broken the rules repeatedly, and continue to do so after I gave you three warnings. Your behaviour is not appropriate or welcome in this community.