MysticKetchup@lemmy.world to Spoilers@mtgzone.comEnglish · 9 days ago[DSK] Paranormal Analystlemmy.worldimagemessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down10
arrow-up122arrow-down1image[DSK] Paranormal Analystlemmy.worldMysticKetchup@lemmy.world to Spoilers@mtgzone.comEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squarerigatti@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoCertainly looks good for limited. I’m not much of a constructed player but I’m also not sure it would be that great there, especially outside standard.
minus-squaretermain@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 days agoIt’s a build around in constructed, for sure. Probably in UG(W)value deck that will be so-so, but fun to play. Does look good in the UG draft archetype, though I’m not a limited player, most days.
![[DSK] Paranormal Analyst](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d4ed92cd-9ba6-4995-860d-f26030a7d831.jpeg){kind=link}
Certainly looks good for limited. I’m not much of a constructed player but I’m also not sure it would be that great there, especially outside standard.
It’s a build around in constructed, for sure. Probably in UG(W)value deck that will be so-so, but fun to play.
Does look good in the UG draft archetype, though I’m not a limited player, most days.