Group Flannery Associates, backed by prominent investors, quietly buy 55,000 acres of farmland in northern California

  • CoffeeAddict@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good question! Planned cities always sound great, but very rarely do they actually become anything without some form of organic growth (and I think they are missing this). And even then, the masterplan needs to allow for that.

    Cities need a reason to exist beyond being a vanity project for some really, really rich tech bros lol.

      • theinspectorst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My reading of the article doesn’t suggest it’s a city particularly intended for rich people, or that it’s intended to survive the apocalypse - when rich people want to try that, they buy remote islands and build nuclear bunkers. I think what they’re going for sounds more like a modern version of the garden city movement.

        In this case, the ‘utopian’ aspect seems limited to building a city with good public transport (which, outside the US, might not be considered especially utopian!) and clean energy.

        • CoffeeAddict@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Garden Cities of Tomorrow by Ebenezer Howard absolutely comes to mind.

          Oddly enough, the Garden City movement was a partial inspiration & justification for American and Canadian suburbs. Poorly executed, of course, and it really is a shame the automotive industry was so effective at lobbying during that same time period becuase they would be so much better executed if they had utilized railroads and streetcars.