• vatlark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m reading on a phone and I really thought the article style was cool. Maybe it was novelty but I liked that I could scroll quickly through it, or I could click on each data point.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      All seems too harsh. On mobile it was OK, probably made it easier to scroll through and read the whole thing without adhd kicking in.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Agree, just make a static site. on mobile I had to keep scrolling multiple times to make all the animations happen

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tldr research shows it isn’t but some people don’t like it and misuse / misquote studies that dealt with constant neglect / stress and apply them to an hour before the kid falls asleep and is crying.

  • HerbSolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When my partner and I started discussing sleep training, we were wondering whether it was a neutral choice for our son (like using formula or a pacifier)

    What a strange thing to say. Both have been shown to have a number of disadvantages.

    The fact that there’s not a lot of data supporting the notion of sleep training being harmful is interesting, but still: What a way to start an article about scientific thinking.