PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoThis rabbit isn't rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1531arrow-down116
arrow-up1515arrow-down1imageThis rabbit isn't rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareOstrakon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up56arrow-down4·2 months agoKinda reductive, no? All it takes for a man to be trans is wearing heels?
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·2 months agoBoy, imagine when some people find out why heels were invented in the first place It was for horse riders, who were almost exclusively men across Eurasian cultures
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoYes but then we discovered it makes your calves fabulous. Then men started wearing full trous, and women started wearing high dresses and skirts, where men wore the shorts and women went full length before.
minus-squareSoulg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up22·2 months agoIt’s like the concept of cross dressers just vanished
minus-squareDraconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoI agree, it’s really not great. Gender should be defined by how the person feels and identifies, not by how they dress.
Kinda reductive, no? All it takes for a man to be trans is wearing heels?
Boy, imagine when some people find out why heels were invented in the first place
Yes but then we discovered it makes your calves fabulous.
Then men started wearing full trous, and women started wearing high dresses and skirts, where men wore the shorts and women went full length before.
It’s like the concept of cross dressers just vanished
I agree, it’s really not great. Gender should be defined by how the person feels and identifies, not by how they dress.