Sometimes unused class or function manages to slip into code base. Static code checkers like ruff, flake8 does not have rules for detecting such globally unused code.

I tried using vulture, but it has too many false positives to have it as part of CI/CD pipeline.

I have tried to implement my own, more reliable check for global deadcode detection.

Please let me know what you think about it.

  • Jason Novinger@programming.devM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is great! I really appreciate that it returns a sensible exit code to the shell so that it can potentially fail a build. I also like the ability to maintain a list of excluded names in pyrpoject.toml so that you don’t always have to sort through false positives.

    Would love to see some more output options, like maybe --quiet that simply passes/fails and returns the exit code with no output or --count that either just displays a count or includes a count in the regular output. I guess I could always pipe the output to wc -l instead of having --count.

    I’ll see if I can’t get this integrated in our CI system at work this next week.

    • Jason Novinger@programming.devM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just coming back around on the count thing, in order to use wc -l, you need to ensure that stderr is piped too. Like:

      deadcode . --exclude=*/tests,conftest.py --ignore-names-in-files=core/settings.py 2>&1 | wc -l
      

      I ran this against a ~8 month old Django project and it turned up 11 unused names, of which 5 were expected and can be whitelisted. Nice!

    • Jason Novinger@programming.devM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would also be nice if I could use some sort of pattern in the --ignore-names option. Apologies if that’s already there and I missed it.

    • niekas@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for your feedback! Its exactly what I was looking for 👍

      I have already added --count, --quiet options and regexp pattern support for --ignore-names option. Let me know if anything else pops into your mind 😃