“I’m a gun owner; Tim Walz is a gun owner,” Harris said.

“I did not know that,” Winfrey replied.

“If somebody breaks into my house, they’re getting shot,” Harris added. “Probably should not have said that. But my staff will deal with that later.”

The article has a video clip. I love the bullshit “probably…” It’s a 100% certainty she spoke with her staff and workshopped the phrasing and presentation of gun stuff. Plus I bet she practiced her lines. No American politician is going to wing it when talking about guns.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Stop gaslighting. You have misrepresented such preparations as “fantasizing about shooting people” and declared such preparations to be “pathological”.

      “Gaslighting is when someone disagrees” You’re being ridiculous. Look back, I never once said that getting/keeping a gun for self defense was pathological beyond the thing I mentioned a few times now about injuring non-home-invaders. I’ve explained this over and over, but you really want to brow beat me into a ridiculous position because, I don’t know, maybe I offended your sensibilities. It doesn’t matter.

      Meanwhile you’ve regressed to liberal Castle Doctrine fantasies, ignoring all the points about avoiding misunderstandings and maybe even caring about human life. We haven’t moved an inch, this conversation is pointless.

      Edit: I don’t care to investigate it at this point, but I’m pretty sure you literally just misread/misinterpreted what I said as a more hardline position than what it was, and no number of paragraphs of explaining what my position is will dissuade you, you just accuse me of “gaslighting” you like some miserable twitter dork, when if you were actually right you could very easily produce evidence.

      This conversation is a waste of time. Stay in your Castle reciting liberal mantras about social contract theory, I don’t give a shit.