• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s several Shakespeare plays involving cross-dressing. So basically they’re going to outlaw Shakespeare.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already banned Shakespeare in several schools for being too sexual.

      • AzuleBlade@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        My freshman year of high school, my AP English teacher made sure to point out all the sexual stuff in Shakespeare, much to our chagrin.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My favorite things about Shakespeare as an English teacher was explaining the innuendos and explaining how Romeo and Juliet was absolutely not a love story lol

          I had a young woman who was a freshman yell at me, crying, that Romeo and Juliet was the greatest love story of all time and it was adorable.

          • MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel like some of that comes down to… Well, us, the adults. For some ungodly reason, we’ve been calling it things like “a love story” and “a tragedy,” and now people just don’t know what to expect.

            We’ve also somewhat sanitized it. The pop-culture focus on it tends to be the lengths they go to in order to be together, or the families coming together at the end; but we tend to ignore that the couple is just trying to be together to bone, it’s full of dick jokes, and at the end they basically get cockblocked so hard that they die.

            Actually, now that I think of it, Kenneth Branaugh is great and all, but I’d love to see a Seth Rogen adaptation of this one.

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s sort of a love story, but it’s obviously a tragic love story. I’m not sure I’d use the word “adorable” but it could certainly be touching, especially to a teen girl.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m a bit confused. Do the inuendos prevent it from being a love story? I always found it to be a tragic lovestory of two horny teenagers. I think hornyness is a common part of being in love.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a tragedy about two teens in who know each other for 4 days, get married after 24 hours, and cause the deaths of 6 people.

              The story opens with Romeo pining after a totally different young woman, which is why his friends take him to the party in the first place

              Ultimately, it’s a warning about foolish love

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I agree with most of this. I differ in that I think foolish love is a Natural and integral part of the age of the protagonists. The teenagers are not ať fault in my eyes. So to me, it seems more like a warning about foolish adults with the prime example being friar Laurence - seriously, wtf man, what were you thinking, you were supposed to know better!

                • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, Romeo and Juliet is the story about how two naive but innocent kids ended up as the victims of their families’ senseless feuding.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s pretty fucked all around. It’s not just any two teens, but the children of two powerful families who are feuding for no reason. I think we can generalize it as a warning against foolishness in general. In the end, all of them were Fortune’s fool, not just Romeo.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It may not be a real love story, but Romeo and Juliet definitely go to bone town. And it was played by two men when Shakespeare wrote it.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans see no issue with banning Shakespeare and any other expression of art

      • GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only book you need is the Bible and the only art is the CROSS. If you have time for entertainment you have time to work and if you’re a kid, go see your local pastor for “work”

        – them, most likely

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Republicans only care about Shakespeare, beethoven, and other such classical plays and music when they can use it as a dog whistle in order to imply an inherent criminality to Black Culture

    • Ertebolle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      And then they’ll turn around and ban all of the ones that don’t involve cross-dressing because in Shakespeare’s time the female parts were all played by men.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      All Shakespearean plays were originally performed by men for all parts aside from children at times as far as I’m aware.