• Sonori@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Again, fences are like cheap locks, they are creating a social barrier to tell people not to pass, not a way of significantly reducing the speed at which someone who wants to will take in doing so.

    How many seconds do you think it takes a truck to drive through one, or someone to hop out of a truck to prop a ladder up against one? What else could be built or funded with the cost of building these expensive signs?

    If your going to spend massive amounts of money on securing a border, at least spend it on the things that actually have an impact, like more patrols and guard posts, not on more extensive signposting.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Norwegian, Finnish and Polish border forces seem to disagree with your estimate on border fences and seem to think as them as valuable tools in addition to others they have. Those are the ones who have had to deal with this migrant issue.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is it the people actually studying effectiveness of preventing security threats from crossing borders, or the politicians and leaders who want to be seen as doing something visible to deal with the ‘migrant issue’ dispite the pure absurdity of suggesting that people who crossed continents will see a fence and just decide to stay illegally in Russia of all places?

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          In Finland it was the border guards who were calling for this. Same for Poland. And it’s easy to see why since it can play an important part in controlling but also as a deterrent and help in knowing about illegal border crossing.