FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agoI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down11
arrow-up1165arrow-down1imageI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareUlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-210 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 month agoThe negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
minus-squareUlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-210 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarefrauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month ago…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now
deleted by creator
The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
deleted by creator
…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now